Many people are canvassing for Afzal. They want that he should not be hanged for attacking India's center of democracy, the Parliament. It was fortunate that he did not succeed in killing peoples' representatives assembled in the parliament, but many other Indians (security personnel)were killed in this attack.
Who are these people and why are they are on the side of the enemy of India? Why are they not on the side of their country and innocent fellow citizens? Why they are asking Indian state to free him? Why are they not asking these terrorists to stop killing innocent people?
Are they the other face of terrorism? Will it be right to call them terrorists without arms?
Added on 03 September 2007
UPA Govt has succeeded in saving an enemy of Indian nation by sleeping on the mercy petition of Afzal. It will be a big mistake to pardon him, so the Govt is delaying a decision for indefinite period. People-rejected Home Minister Patil has already said that there is no time limit for taking such decisions. Now Rashtrapati Bhawan also has a Sonia loyalist.
इंटरव्यू
10 years ago
1 comment:
Yes, you are right. They are the other face of terrorism. You can call them terrorists without arms, but in my opinion thy are more dangerous than armed terrorists.They work to pressurize police and judiciary and to mould public opinion in favour of terrorists.
Post a Comment